Winner
AMD FX 6300
CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 6300 based on its value.
See full details AMD FX 6350 vs 6300 |
Released April, 2013
AMD FX 6350
- 3.9 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
7.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD FX 6350
 | Higher clock speed 3.9 GHz | | Better PassMark score 7,379 |
| | Newer Apr, 2013 |
by Tech RadarAll GPUs being equal, the AMD chip is going to hold back your graphics card in comparison to the performance you could get in combination with an Intel CPU.
VS
Released October, 2012
AMD FX 6300
- 3.5 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
7.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the 6300
| | Much better performance per dollar 25.25 pt/$ | | Significantly better PassMark (Overclocked) score 7,541 |
| | Lower typical power consumption 77.19W | | Lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year |
by Tech Radar (Dec, 2012)In fact if anything the overclocking performance has been enhanced.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6350 vs 6300
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and Passmark (Single Core) | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Passmark (Overclocked), Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | AMD FX 6300CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.5 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 7,379 | vs | 6,444 | Around 15% better PassMark score | |||
| Newer | Apr, 2013 | vs | Oct, 2012 | Release date 6 months later | |||
| |||||||
| Much better performance per dollar | 25.25 pt/$ | vs | 8.75 pt/$ | Around 3x better performance per dollar | |||
| Significantly better PassMark (Overclocked) score | 7,541 | vs | 3,626.2 | More than 2x better PassMark (Overclocked) score | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 101.56W | Around 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 109.5 $/year | Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 30.11 $/year | Around 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 6350 vs 6300
GeekBench (32-bit)
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Reviews Word on the street
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | FX 6350 | vs | 6300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Hexa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM3+ | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | Yes | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX 1.1 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| AVX | |||
| XOP | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| CLMUL | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| F16C | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| ABM | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AES | |||
| TBM | |||
| CVT16 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1866 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 29,866.66 MB/s | 29,866.66 MB/s | |
details | FX 6350 | vs | 6300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 6 | 6 | |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.33 MB/core | 1.33 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nms | 32 nms | |
| Transistor count | 1,200,000,000 | 1,200,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 21 | 20 | |
| Voltage range | 0.8 - 1.45V | 0.8 - 1.43V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 3 | 82 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.66 GHz | 4.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.89 GHz | 4.76 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 3,626.2 | 7,541 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.66 GHz | 4.8 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 125W | 95W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 30.11 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 109.5 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 6.56 pt/W | 7.44 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 101.56W | 77.19W | |
 AMD FX 6350  Report a correction |  AMD FX 6300 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $227 | $100 | |
| Intel Core i5 3570K vs AMD FX 6300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $189 | $100 | |
| Intel Core i5 4460 vs AMD FX 6300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $120 | $100 | |
| Intel Core i3 4150 vs AMD FX 6300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $139 | $100 | |
| AMD FX 8320 vs 6300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $149 | $100 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs 6300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $117 | $100 | |
| Intel Core i3 4160 vs AMD FX 6300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $65 | $100 | |
| Intel Pentium G3258 vs AMD FX 6300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $330 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $364 | $330 | |
| Intel Core i7 5820K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS | |
| $230 | $330 | |
| Intel Core i5 4690K vs i7 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $49 | |
| Intel Pentium N3530 vs Core i3 3110M | ||
| | VS | |
| $230 | $149 | |
| Intel Core i5 4690K vs AMD FX 8350 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 5 comments.
