Winner
AMD FX 6350
CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 6350 based on its .
See full details AMD FX 6350 vs 6300 |
Released October, 2012
AMD FX 6350
- 3.9 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
7.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD FX 6350
 | Higher clock speed 3.9 GHz | | Better PassMark score 7,379 |
by Tech RadarAll GPUs being equal, the AMD chip is going to hold back your graphics card in comparison to the performance you could get in combination with an Intel CPU.
VS
Released October, 2012
AMD FX 6300
- 3.5 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
7.5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the 6300
| | Significantly better PassMark (Overclocked) score 7,541 | | Lower typical power consumption 77.19W |
| | Lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year | | Lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year |
by Tech Radar (Dec, 2012)In fact if anything the overclocking performance has been enhanced.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6350 vs 6300
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and Passmark (Single Core) | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Passmark (Overclocked), Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
AMD FX 6350CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.5 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 7,379 | vs | 6,444 | Around 15% better PassMark score | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly better PassMark (Overclocked) score | 7,541 | vs | 3,626.2 | More than 2x better PassMark (Overclocked) score | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 101.56W | Around 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 109.5 $/year | Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 30.11 $/year | Around 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 6350 vs 6300
GeekBench (32-bit)
Cinebench R10 32-Bit
FX 6300 | by Tech Radar (Dec, 2012)In the other straight CPU performance tests in Cinebench it shows a very slight advantage, though the improvements in single-threaded performance aren't as pronounced as with the FX-8350.
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Reviews Word on the street
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | FX 6350 | vs | 6300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Hexa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM3+ | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | Yes | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 125W | 95W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 30.11 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 109.5 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 6.89 pt/W | 7.78 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 101.56W | 77.19W | |
details | FX 6350 | vs | 6300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 6 | 6 | |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.33 MB/core | 1.33 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nms | 32 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 3 | 82 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.66 GHz | 4.82 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.83 GHz | 4.79 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 3,626.2 | 7,541 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.66 GHz | 4.82 GHz | |
 AMD FX 6350  Report a correction |  AMD FX 6300 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $120 | |
| Intel Core i5 3570K vs AMD FX 6300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $120 | $120 | |
| Intel Core i3 4130 vs AMD FX 6300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $150 | $120 | |
| AMD FX 8320 vs 6300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $120 | |
| Intel Core i3 4150 vs AMD FX 6300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | $120 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs 6300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $120 | |
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD FX 6300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $102 | $120 | |
| AMD FX 4300 vs 6300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $329 | $313 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $340 | $313 | |
| Intel 4790K vs Core i7 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $195 | $313 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $235 | $180 | |
| Intel Core i5 4670K vs AMD FX 8350 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $378 | ||
| Intel Core i7 4700MQ vs AMD A10 5750M | ||
 | VS |  |
| $393 | $281 | |
| Intel Core i7 4500U vs i5 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $281 | |
| Intel Core i5 4200M vs 4200U | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 2 comments.
