Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 6300

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 6300

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Front view of AMD Athlon II X3 2.7 GHz

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X3 2.7 GHz

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon II X3 2.7 GHz vs the FX 6300.

Features Key features of the FX 6300  vs Athlon II X3 2.7 GHz 

clock speed

FX 6300
3.5 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 6300  vs
Athlon II X3 2.7 GHz 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Hexa core Tri core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

FX 6300  vs
Athlon II X3 2.7 GHz 
Threads 6 3
L2 cache 6 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.67 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 77.19W N/A

bus

Clock speed 2,600 MHz 2,000 MHz
AMD FX 6300
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II X3 2.7 GHz
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus