Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 6300

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 6300

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 1 MB 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
More cores 6 vs 2 Three times as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 6 vs 2 Three times as many threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.75 GHz vs 3.8 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.82 GHz vs 3.8 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD A4 6320

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 6320

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly higher clock speed 3.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 77.19W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C vs 62.5 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Dec, 2013 vs Oct, 2012 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 6300 vs A4 6320

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6300
7,871
A4 6320
3,258

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6300
2,053
A4 6320
2,074

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6300
2,290,000 MB/s
A4 6320
2,250 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

FX 6300
6,444
A4 6320
2,322

PassMark (Single Core)

FX 6300
1,446
A4 6320
1,427

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 6300  vs
A4 6320 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores Hexa core Dual core
Socket type
AM3+
FM2
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
ABM
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 65W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 9.84 pt/W 1.55 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 52.81W

details

FX 6300  vs
A4 6320 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 6 2
L2 cache 6 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 62.5°C Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.75 GHz 3.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.82 GHz 3.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.75 GHz 3.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon HD 8000 series
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 760 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 29,866.66 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
AMD FX 6300
Report a correction
AMD A4 6320
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus