CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6300 vs 5800K among desktop CPUs (over 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

FX 6300
6.2
A10 5800K
6.4
FX 8350
7.4
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

FX 6300
6.6
A10 5800K
6.7
FX 8350
6.9
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

FX 6300
0.0
A10 5800K
9.8
FX 8350
0.0
Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

FX 6300
0.0
A10 5800K
7.2
FX 8350
0.0
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

FX 6300
6.0
A10 5800K
8.4
FX 8350
5.7
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

FX 6300
6.5
A10 5800K
9.6
FX 8350
6.3
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

9.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

FX 6300
5.8
A10 5800K
9.2
FX 8350
5.8

Winner
AMD FX 6300 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 6300  based on its performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 6300

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 6300

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 4 MB 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better PassMark score 6,444 vs 4,639 Around 40% better PassMark score
Much lower typical power consumption 77.19W vs 81.25W 5% lower typical power consumption
More cores 6 vs 4 2 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 6 vs 4 2 more threads
Much better performance per dollar 9.45 pt/$ vs 7.14 pt/$ More than 30% better performance per dollar
Much better performance per watt 9.95 pt/W vs 6.07 pt/W Around 65% better performance per watt
Much better cinebench r10 32Bit score 16,213 vs 13,119 Around 25% better cinebench r10 32Bit score
Much lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year vs 24.09 $/year Around 5% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year vs 87.6 $/year Around 5% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.76 GHz vs 4.49 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score 4,101 vs 4,083 Almost the same
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.81 GHz vs 4.59 GHz Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Oct, 2012 Release date 3 weeks later
Front view of AMD A10 5800K

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 5800K

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 4.2 GHz vs 4.1 GHz Almost the same

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 6300 vs A10 5800K

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6300
7,871
A10 5800K
6,004

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6300
2,053
A10 5800K
2,093

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6300
2,290,000 MB/s
A10 5800K
2,340,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6300
7,447
A10 5800K
5,765

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6300
8,232
A10 5800K
8,036

GeekBench

FX 6300
9,503
A10 5800K
8,036

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

FX 6300
6,444
A10 5800K
4,639

PassMark (Single Core)

FX 6300
1,446
A10 5800K
1,460

Reviews Word on the street

FX 6300  vs A10 5800K 

8.0
8.0
That said you don't really need to have an overclocking mobo to push the Core i5 up over 4.5GHz and gaming performance will quickly outstrip the AMD chip.
FX 6300

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 6300  vs
A10 5800K 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo clock speed 4.1 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores Hexa core Quad core
Is unlocked Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 7660D
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 800 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866

details

FX 6300  vs
A10 5800K 
Threads 6 4
L2 cache 6 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 1.33 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 1,200,000,000 1,303,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Die size 319 mm² 246 mm²
Voltage range 0.8 - 1.43V 0.83 - 1.48V
Operating temperature Unknown - 62.5°C Unknown - 74°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 82 10
Overclocked clock speed 4.76 GHz 4.49 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.81 GHz 4.59 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 7,541 2,959.6
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.76 GHz 4.49 GHz

power consumption

TDP 95W 100W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 24.09 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 87.6 $/year
Performance per watt 9.95 pt/W 6.07 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 81.25W
AMD FX 6300
Report a correction
AMD A10 5800K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus