CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6100 vs 5800K among desktop CPUs (over 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

FX 6100
5.9
A10 5800K
6.7
FX 6300
6.3
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

FX 6100
6.2
A10 5800K
6.8
FX 6300
6.7
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

FX 6100
0.0
A10 5800K
9.8
FX 6300
0.0
Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

FX 6100
0.0
A10 5800K
7.1
FX 6300
0.0
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

FX 6100
5.9
A10 5800K
8.5
FX 6300
6.0
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

FX 6100
5.6
A10 5800K
9.6
FX 6300
6.6
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

9.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

FX 6100
5.4
A10 5800K
9.2
FX 6300
5.7

Winner
AMD A10 5800K 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A10 5800K  based on its single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A10 5800K

AMD A10 5800K

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 6100

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 6100

Report a correction
Significantly more l3 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More l2 cache 6 MB vs 4 MB 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 6 vs 4 2 more cores; run more applications at once
Significantly more l3 cache per core 1.33 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core More than 5.2x more l3 cache per core
More threads 6 vs 4 2 more threads
Front view of AMD A10 5800K

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 5800K

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 4.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 74 °C vs 70 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much better performance per watt 7.47 pt/W vs 2.87 pt/W More than 2.5x better performance per watt
Better performance per dollar 8.79 pt/$ vs 5.45 pt/$ More than 60% better performance per dollar
Much lower annual home energy cost 24.09 $/year vs 48.09 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Better geekbench 3 single core score 2,093 vs 1,798 More than 15% better geekbench 3 single core score
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Oct, 2011 Release date 11 months later
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 87.6 $/year vs 136.66 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.49 GHz vs 4.38 GHz Almost the same

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 6100 vs A10 5800K

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6100
6,990
A10 5800K
6,004

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6100
1,798
A10 5800K
2,093

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6100
2,090,000 MB/s
A10 5800K
2,340,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6100
6,679
A10 5800K
5,765

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6100
7,818
A10 5800K
8,036

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

FX 6100
5,440
A10 5800K
3,590

Cinebench R11.5

FX 6100
4.07
A10 5800K
3.32

Cinebench R11.5 (Single Core)

FX 6100
0.95
A10 5800K
1.08

Reviews Word on the street

FX 6100  vs A10 5800K 

7.0
8.0
Run Metro 2033 at 1,280 x 800 using the global 'high' rather than 'very high' setting and you'll get just 12fps without anti-aliasing.
A10 5800K

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 6100  vs
A10 5800K 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores Hexa core Quad core
Is unlocked Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 7660D
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 800 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866

details

FX 6100  vs
A10 5800K 
Threads 6 4
L2 cache 6 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 1.33 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 1,200,000,000 1,303,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Die size 319 mm² 246 mm²
Voltage range 1.21 - 1.35V 0.83 - 1.48V
Operating temperature Unknown - 70°C Unknown - 74°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 142 10
Overclocked clock speed 4.38 GHz 4.49 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.56 GHz 4.6 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 3,158.7 2,959.6
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.38 GHz 4.49 GHz

power consumption

TDP 95W 100W
Annual home energy cost 48.09 $/year 24.09 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 136.66 $/year 87.6 $/year
Performance per watt 2.87 pt/W 7.47 pt/W
Typical power consumption N/A 81.25W
AMD FX 6100
Report a correction
AMD A10 5800K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus