CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4350 vs 4130

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

FX 4350
6.7
FX 4130
6.5
Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

FX 4350
8.0
FX 4130
7.6
Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

FX 4350
9.9
FX 4130
9.8
Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

FX 4350
8.1
FX 4130
7.5
Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

FX 4350
7.5
FX 4130
7.2

Winner
AMD FX 4350 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 4350  based on its overclocking.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD FX 4350

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD FX 4350

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 4350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4350

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 4.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark11 physics score 7,140 vs 4,311 More than 65% better 3DMark11 physics score
Better performance per dollar 6.88 pt/$ vs 5.52 pt/$ Around 25% better performance per dollar
Much lower annual home energy cost 30.11 $/year vs 59.66 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Better PassMark score 5,266 vs 4,186 More than 25% better PassMark score
Better performance per watt 6.33 pt/W vs 2.79 pt/W More than 2.2x better performance per watt
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,523 vs 1,402 Around 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 5.1 GHz vs 4.69 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 109.5 $/year vs 173.45 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score 4,469 vs 3,560 More than 25% better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score
Marginally newer Apr, 2013 vs Feb, 2012 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of AMD FX 4130

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4130

Report a correction
Slightly higher turbo clock speed 4.4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz Almost the same

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 4350 vs 4130

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

FX 4350
13,999
FX 4130
12,023
FX 4350 FX 4130 @ anandtech.com

Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)

FX 4350
4,469
FX 4130
3,560
FX 4350 FX 4130 @ anandtech.com

Passmark

FX 4350
5,266
FX 4130
4,186

Passmark (Single Core)

FX 4350
1,523
FX 4130
1,402

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 4350  vs
4130 
Clock speed 4.2 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo clock speed 4.3 GHz 4.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
AM3+
Is unlocked Yes Yes
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 29,866.66 MB/s 12,800 MB/s

details

FX 4350  vs
4130 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 4 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 5.1 GHz 4.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.16 GHz 5.03 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 5.1 GHz 4.69 GHz

power consumption

TDP 125W 125W
Annual home energy cost 30.11 $/year 59.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 109.5 $/year 173.45 $/year
Performance per watt 6.33 pt/W 2.79 pt/W
Typical power consumption 101.56W N/A
AMD FX 4350
Report a correction
AMD FX 4130
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus