CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4350 vs 4130

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

FX 4350
6.9
FX 4130
6.5
Passmark

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

FX 4350
8.3
FX 4130
7.8
Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

FX 4350
9.9
FX 4130
9.6
Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

FX 4350
7.3
FX 4130
6.9
Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

FX 4350
7.6
FX 4130
7.2

Winner
AMD FX 4350 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 4350  based on its overclocking.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD FX 4350

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD FX 4350

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 4350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4350

Report a correction
Significantly more l3 cache 8 MB vs 4 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 4.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Much more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,525 vs 1,269 More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 5.1 GHz vs 4.26 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark score 5,282 vs 4,193 More than 25% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark11 physics score 7,140 vs 5,990 Around 20% better 3DMark11 physics score
Better performance per dollar 10.22 pt/$ vs 8.4 pt/$ More than 20% better performance per dollar
Marginally newer Apr, 2013 vs Aug, 2012 Release date 8 months later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.16 GHz vs 4.74 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD FX 4130

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4130

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 4130 vs the 4350.

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 4350 vs 4130

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

FX 4350
7,140
FX 4130
5,990
FX 4350 FX 4130 @ community.futuremark.com

Passmark

FX 4350
5,282
FX 4130
4,193

Passmark (Single Core)

FX 4350
1,525
FX 4130
1,269

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 4350  vs
4130 
Clock speed 4.2 GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
AM3+
Is unlocked Yes Yes
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

details

FX 4350  vs
4130 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 4 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 5.1 GHz 4.26 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.16 GHz 4.74 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 5.1 GHz 4.26 GHz

power consumption

TDP 125W 125W
Annual home energy cost 30.11 $/year 30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 109.5 $/year 109.5 $/year
Performance per watt 6.04 pt/W 4.68 pt/W
Typical power consumption 101.56W 101.56W
AMD FX 4350
Report a correction
AMD FX 4130
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus