CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4350 vs 5200 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD FX 4350 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 4350  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD FX 4350

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD FX 4350

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 4350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4350

Report a correction
Much higher turbo clock speed 4.3 GHz vs 0 GHz Compared to all cpus, 4.3 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK
Much higher clock speed 4.2 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 2x higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score 4,469 vs 1,986 More than 2.2x better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.93 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better geekbench 3 single core score 2,207 vs 1,061 More than 2x better geekbench 3 single core score
Better PassMark score 5,302 vs 2,403 Around 2.2x better PassMark score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.18 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Better cinebench r10 32Bit score 13,999 vs 6,761 More than 2x better cinebench r10 32Bit score
Front view of AMD A6 5200

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 5200

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 20.31W vs 101.56W 5x lower typical power consumption
Newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 61.1 °C More than 45% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better performance per watt 9.4 pt/W vs 7.76 pt/W More than 20% better performance per watt
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year vs 109.5 $/year 5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year vs 30.11 $/year 5x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 4350 vs A6 5200

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 4350
6,444
A6 5200
3,330

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 4350
2,207
A6 5200
1,061

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 4350
2,430,000 MB/s
A6 5200
982,400 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 4350
6,124
A6 5200
3,224

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 4350
6,828
A6 5200
3,436

GeekBench

FX 4350
6,828
A6 5200
3,436

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

FX 4350
5,302
A6 5200
2,403

PassMark (Single Core)

FX 4350
1,527
A6 5200
778

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 4350  vs
A6 5200 
Clock speed 4.2 GHz 2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 4.3 GHz 0 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 125W 25W
Annual home energy cost 30.11 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 109.5 $/year 21.9 $/year
Performance per watt 7.76 pt/W 9.4 pt/W
Typical power consumption 101.56W 20.31W

details

FX 4350  vs
A6 5200 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 4 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 0 MB None
Manufacture process 32 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 61.1°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.93 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.18 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.93 GHz 2 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 8400
Latest DirectX N/A 11.1
GPU clock speed N/A 600 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1600
AMD FX 4350
Report a correction
AMD A6 5200
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus