CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4300 vs 4130

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

FX 4300
6.7
FX 4130
6.6
Cinebench R11.5, Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

FX 4300
7.9
FX 4130
7.7
Cinebench R11.5 (1-core), Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and 1 more

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

FX 4300
9.3
FX 4130
9.3
Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

FX 4300
7.8
FX 4130
7.5
Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

FX 4300
7.4
FX 4130
7.2

Winner
AMD FX 4300 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 4300  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD FX 4300

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD FX 4300

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 4300

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4300

Report a correction
Better 3DMark11 physics score 6,610 vs 4,311 Around 55% better 3DMark11 physics score
Much lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year vs 59.66 $/year 2.6x lower annual home energy cost
Better performance per watt 6.79 pt/W vs 2.8 pt/W Around 2.5x better performance per watt
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,422 vs 1,274 More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year vs 173.45 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better performance per dollar 6.14 pt/$ vs 5.55 pt/$ More than 10% better performance per dollar
Better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score 4,114 vs 3,560 More than 15% better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score
Marginally newer Oct, 2012 vs Feb, 2012 Release date 7 months later
Front view of AMD FX 4130

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4130

Report a correction
Significantly more l3 cache 8 MB vs 4 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 4300 vs 4130

Cinebench R11.5

FX 4300
3.47
FX 4130
3.28

Cinebench R11.5 (Single Core)

FX 4300
1.06
FX 4130
1.03

Passmark

FX 4300
4,719
FX 4130
4,195

Passmark (Single Core)

FX 4300
1,422
FX 4130
1,274

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 4300  vs
4130 
Clock speed 3.8 GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
AM3+
Is unlocked Yes Yes
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

details

FX 4300  vs
4130 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 4 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclock popularity 7 11
Overclocked clock speed 4.74 GHz 4.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 5 GHz 5.06 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.74 GHz 4.7 GHz

power consumption

TDP 95W 125W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 59.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 173.45 $/year
Performance per watt 6.79 pt/W 2.8 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W N/A
AMD FX 4300
Report a correction
AMD FX 4130
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus