CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4300 vs 4130

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

FX 4300
7.1
FX 4130
6.9
Cinebench R11.5 and Passmark

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

FX 4300
8.8
FX 4130
8.4
Cinebench R11.5 (1-core) and Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

FX 4300
9.5
FX 4130
9.7
Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

FX 4300
8.4
FX 4130
7.8
Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

FX 4300
8.0
FX 4130
7.7

Winner
AMD FX 4300 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 4300  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD FX 4300

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD FX 4300

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 4300

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4300

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 77.19W vs 101.56W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Significantly better cinebench r11.5 (1-core) score 1.06 vs 0.95 More than 10% better cinebench r11.5 (1-core) score
Better performance per dollar 11.09 pt/$ vs 9.04 pt/$ Around 25% better performance per dollar
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,417 vs 1,262 More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
Slightly better performance per watt 6.32 pt/W vs 4.59 pt/W Around 40% better performance per watt
Lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year vs 109.5 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year vs 30.11 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Aug, 2012 Release date 1 months later
Front view of AMD FX 4130

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4130

Report a correction
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.69 GHz vs 3.8 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 4300 vs 4130

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

FX 4300
6,610
FX 4130
5,990

Cinebench R11.5

FX 4300
3.47
FX 4130
3.11

Cinebench R11.5 (Single Core)

FX 4300
1.06
FX 4130
0.95

Passmark

FX 4300
4,676
FX 4130
4,156

Passmark (Single Core)

FX 4300
1,417
FX 4130
1,262

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 4300  vs
4130 
Clock speed 3.8 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
AM3+
Is unlocked Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 125W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 109.5 $/year
Performance per watt 6.32 pt/W 4.59 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 101.56W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 29,866.66 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s

details

FX 4300  vs
4130 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 4 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 1,200,000,000 1,200,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Die size 319 mm² 319 mm²
Clock multiplier 20 20
Voltage range 0.82 - 1.43V 0.78 - 1.43V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.48 GHz 4.39 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.8 GHz 4.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.48 GHz 4.39 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD FX 4300
Report a correction
AMD FX 4130
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus