CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4300 vs 4130

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

FX 4300
6.9
FX 4130
6.7
Cinebench R11.5 and Passmark

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

FX 4300
8.1
FX 4130
7.7
Cinebench R11.5 (1-core) and Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

FX 4300
9.8
FX 4130
9.7
Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

FX 4300
8.3
FX 4130
9.0
Performance Per Dollar

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 4300

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4300

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 77.19W vs 101.56W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,419 vs 1,269 More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better cinebench r11.5 (1-core) score 1.06 vs 0.95 More than 10% better cinebench r11.5 (1-core) score
Slightly better performance per watt 6.47 pt/W vs 4.69 pt/W Around 40% better performance per watt
Lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year vs 109.5 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year vs 30.11 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 5 GHz vs 4.53 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Marginally newer Oct, 2012 vs Aug, 2012 Release date 1 months later
Front view of AMD FX 4130

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4130

Report a correction
Better performance per dollar 8.51 pt/$ vs 7.01 pt/$ More than 20% better performance per dollar

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 4300 vs 4130

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

FX 4300
6,610
FX 4130
5,990
FX 4300 FX 4130 @ community.futuremark.com

Cinebench R11.5

FX 4300
3.47
FX 4130
3.11

Cinebench R11.5 (Single Core)

FX 4300
1.06
FX 4130
0.95

Passmark

FX 4300
4,702
FX 4130
4,190

Passmark (Single Core)

FX 4300
1,419
FX 4130
1,269

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 4300  vs
4130 
Clock speed 3.8 GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
AM3+
Is unlocked Yes Yes
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

details

FX 4300  vs
4130 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 4 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.5 GHz 4.54 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 5 GHz 4.53 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.5 GHz 4.54 GHz

power consumption

TDP 95W 125W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 109.5 $/year
Performance per watt 6.47 pt/W 4.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 101.56W
AMD FX 4300
Report a correction
AMD FX 4130
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus