CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4300 vs 615e among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD FX 4300 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 4300  based on its overclocking.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 4300

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4300

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz More than 50% higher clock speed
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much more l3 cache 4 MB vs 0.5 MB 8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l3 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.13 MB/core 8x more l3 cache per core
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Sep, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
Front view of AMD Athlon II X4 615e

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X4 615e

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 77.19W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 83.22 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 22.89 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost
Higher Maximum operating temperature 72 °C vs 70.5 °C Almost the same

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 4300 vs Athlon II X4 615e

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 4300
2,210,000 MB/s
Athlon II X4 615e
99.8 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 4300  vs
Athlon II X4 615e 
Clock speed 3.8 GHz 2.5 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
AM3+
AM3
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 45W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 9.24 pt/W 1.94 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 36.56W

details

FX 4300  vs
Athlon II X4 615e 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 4 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.13 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.81 - 1.43V 0.78 - 1.25V
Operating temperature Unknown - 70.5°C Unknown - 72°C

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD FX 4300
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II X4 615e
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus