Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 4300

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4300

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the FX 4300 vs the Athlon 64 3000+.

Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon 64 3000+ vs the FX 4300.

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 4300 vs Athlon 64 3000+

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

FX 4300
5,404

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 4300  vs
Athlon 64 3000+ 
Cores Quad core Single core
Socket type
AM3+
754

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM

details

FX 4300  vs
Athlon 64 3000+ 
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 4 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 70.5°C Unknown - 70°C

power consumption

TDP 95W 89W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 21.44 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 77.96 $/year
Typical power consumption 77.19W 72.31W
AMD FX 4300
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3000+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus