Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 4150

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4150

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 8 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 8 MB l3 cache is just OK
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much higher clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 2 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4 GHz vs 3.72 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jan, 2012 vs Jun, 2009 Release date over 2 years later
Front view of AMD Athlon II X2 250

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X2 250

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 77.19W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 74 °C vs 70 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 4150 vs Athlon II X2 250

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 4150
1,950 MB/s
Athlon II X2 250
120,700 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 4150  vs
Athlon II X2 250 
Clock speed 3.8 GHz 3 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
AM3+
AM3
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
ABM
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 65W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 1.36 pt/W 1.79 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 52.81W

details

FX 4150  vs
Athlon II X2 250 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 4 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.75 - 1.4V 0.85 - 1.43V
Operating temperature Unknown - 70°C Unknown - 74°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4 GHz 3.72 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4 GHz 4.04 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4 GHz 3.72 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 2,600 MHz 2,000 MHz
AMD FX 4150
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II X2 250
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus