CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4100 vs 3650 among desktop CPUs (over 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

2.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD FX 4100 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 4100  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 4100

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4100

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Front view of AMD A6 3650

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 3650

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 4100 vs A6 3650

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 4100
5,176
A6 3650
4,900

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 4100
1,827
A6 3650
1,372

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 4100
2,150,000 MB/s
A6 3650
108,700 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 4100
4,993
A6 3650
4,760

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 4100
5,580
A6 3650
6,340

GeekBench

FX 4100
6,919
A6 3650
6,340

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

FX 4100
4,051
A6 3650
3,169

PassMark (Single Core)

FX 4100
1,221
A6 3650
903

Reviews Word on the street

FX 4100  vs A6 3650 

7.0
8.0

8.1
8.6

Overall

8.1 Out of 10
8.2 Out of 10

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 4100  vs
A6 3650 
Clock speed 3.6 GHz 2.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz None
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6530D
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 443 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866

details

FX 4100  vs
A6 3650 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 4 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 1,200,000,000 1,178,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Die size 319 mm² 228 mm²
Voltage range 1.14 - 1.55V 0.91 - 1.41V
Operating temperature Unknown - 70.5°C Unknown - 72.7°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 127 10
Overclock review score 4 4
Overclocked clock speed 4.66 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.99 GHz 5.12 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.66 GHz 3.5 GHz

power consumption

TDP 95W 100W
Annual home energy cost 34.18 $/year 37.37 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 114.41 $/year 105.12 $/year
Performance per watt 6.46 pt/W 1.04 pt/W
Idle power consumption 43W 62.2W
Peak power consumption 130.6W 120W
Typical power consumption N/A 105.55W
AMD FX 4100
Report a correction
AMD A6 3650
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus