Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD E2 6110

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD E2 6110

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E2 6110

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 6110

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 101.56W 8.3x lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 20.72 pt/W vs 0.64 pt/W Around 32.2x better performance per watt
Newer Apr, 2014 vs May, 2006 Release date over 8 years later
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 63 °C Around 45% higher Maximum operating temperature
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 30.11 $/year 8.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 109.5 $/year 8.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 FX 62

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 FX 62

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 85% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.15 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better PassMark (Single core) score 864 vs 576 50% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.35 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of E2 6110 vs Athlon 64 FX 62

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E2 6110
1,893

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E2 6110  vs
Athlon 64 FX 62 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 769
AM2

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

E2 6110  vs
Athlon 64 FX 62 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C Unknown - 63°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.5 GHz 3.15 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 3.35 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.5 GHz 3.15 GHz

power consumption

TDP 15W 125W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 109.5 $/year
Performance per watt 20.72 pt/W 0.64 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 101.56W
AMD E2 6110
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 FX 62
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus