Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E2 3200

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 3200

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l3 cache 0.5 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 0.5 MB l3 cache is just OK
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 101.56W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 71.5 °C vs 55 °C 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much better performance per watt 1.14 pt/W vs 0.53 pt/W Around 2.2x better performance per watt
Much more l3 cache per core 0.25 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 0.25 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
Newer Nov, 2019 vs Feb, 2007 Release date over 12 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 30.11 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 109.5 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon X2 6000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 6000+

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark score 1,604 vs 1,436 More than 10% better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 898 vs 800 More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,188 vs 2,093 Around 5% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.53 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.33 GHz vs 3.28 GHz Almost the same

Benchmarks Real world tests of E2 3200 vs Athlon X2 6000+

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E2 3200
2,093

GeekBench

E2 3200
2,093

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E2 3200
1,436

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E2 3200  vs
Athlon X2 6000+ 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 125W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 109.5 $/year
Performance per watt 1.14 pt/W 0.53 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 101.56W

details

E2 3200  vs
Athlon X2 6000+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 0.5 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.91 - 1.41V 1.35 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 71.5°C Unknown - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.28 GHz 3.33 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 3.53 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.28 GHz 3.33 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label AMD Radeon HD 6370D N/A
AMD E2 3200
Report a correction
AMD Athlon X2 6000+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus