0 Comments
| AMD E2 1800 vs E 450 |
Released June, 2012
AMD E2 1800
- 1.7 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E2 1800
![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Significantly better geekbench 3 AES single core score 55,000 MB/s |
![]() | Significantly better 3DMark06 CPU score 18.7 | ![]() | Better turbo clock speed 680 MHz |
VS
Released August, 2011
AMD E 450
- 1.65 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the E 450
![]() | Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score 9.69 mHash/s |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1800 vs 450 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | AMD E 450CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 40 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 55,000 MB/s | vs | 53,200 MB/s | Around 5% better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
Significantly better 3DMark06 CPU score | 18.7 | vs | 18.4 | Almost the same | |||
Better turbo clock speed | 680 MHz | vs | 600 MHz | Around 15% better turbo clock speed | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 90 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Newer | Jun, 2012 | vs | Aug, 2011 | Release date 9 months later | |||
| |||||||
Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score | 9.69 mHash/s | vs | 7.42 mHash/s | More than 30% better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score |
Benchmarks Real world tests of E2 1800 vs E 450
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E2 1800 | vs | E 450 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | None | None | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
AMD64 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 |
details | E2 1800 | vs | E 450 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 40 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 5 | 25 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Radeon™ HD 7340 | Radeon™ HD 6320 | |
Latest DirectX | 11.0 | 11.0 | |
GPU clock speed | 523 MHz | 508 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 680 MHz | 600 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 18W | 18W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 15.77 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.71 pt/W | 2.98 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 14.63W | 14.63W |
AMD E2 1800 ![]() | AMD E 450 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
450 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$99 | ||
450 vs 2450M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
450 vs 350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
1800 vs 2328M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | ||
1800 vs 3570T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
1800 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$246 | ||
1800 vs B960 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||