CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1800 vs 450 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

E2 1800
n.d.
E 450
0.0
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

E2 1800
n.d.
E 450
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD E 450 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD E 450  based on its performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD E 450

AMD E 450

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E2 1800

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 1800

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better geekbench 3 AES single core score 55,000 MB/s vs 53,200 MB/s Around 5% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly better 3DMark06 CPU score 18.7 vs 18.4 Almost the same
Better turbo clock speed 680 MHz vs 600 MHz Around 15% better turbo clock speed
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Aug, 2011 Release date 9 months later
Front view of AMD E 450

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 450

Report a correction
Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score 9.69 mHash/s vs 7.42 mHash/s More than 30% better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score

Benchmarks Real world tests of E2 1800 vs E 450

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

E2 1800
7.42 mHash/s
E 450
9.69 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

E2 1800
53.74 fps
E 450
60.83 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

E2 1800
0.07 fps
E 450
0.14 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E2 1800
1,184
E 450
1,127

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E2 1800
659
E 450
642

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E2 1800
55,000 MB/s
E 450
53,200 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E2 1800
822
E 450
770

PassMark (Single Core)

E2 1800
448
E 450
431

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E2 1800  vs
E 450 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.65 GHz
Turbo clock speed None None
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333

details

E2 1800  vs
E 450 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 5 25
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Radeon™ HD 7340 Radeon™ HD 6320
Latest DirectX 11.0 11.0
GPU clock speed 523 MHz 508 MHz
Turbo clock speed 680 MHz 600 MHz

power consumption

TDP 18W 18W
Annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 2.71 pt/W 2.98 pt/W
Typical power consumption 14.63W 14.63W
AMD E2 1800
Report a correction
AMD E 450
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus