CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1800 vs 1600

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PassMark and GeekBench

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Value

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Value

Winner
AMD Athlon 1600 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Athlon 1600  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD Athlon 1600

AMD Athlon 1600

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E2 1800

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 1800

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 55 °C More than 80% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 36.56W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 7.94 pt/W vs 2.22 pt/W More than 3.5x better performance per watt
Lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 39.42 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 10.84 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon 1600

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 1600

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 644 vs 451 Around 45% better PassMark (Single core) score

Benchmarks Real world tests of E2 1800 vs Athlon 1600

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E2 1800
1,093
Athlon 1600
1,012

GeekBench

E2 1800
1,628
Athlon 1600
2,006

PassMark Data courtesy PassMark

PassMark (Single Core) Data courtesy PassMark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E2 1800  vs
Athlon 1600 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

power consumption

TDP 18W 45W
Annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 7.94 pt/W 2.22 pt/W
Typical power consumption 14.63W 36.56W

details

E2 1800  vs
Athlon 1600 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 0.5 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 55°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Radeon™ HD 7340 N/A
Latest DirectX 11.0 N/A
GPU clock speed 523 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 680 MHz N/A
AMD E2 1800
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 1600
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus