CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E1-1500 vs 5200

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Winner
AMD A6 5200 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A6 5200  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A6 5200

AMD A6 5200

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E1 E1-1500

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 E1-1500

Report a correction
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 20.31W Around 30% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 6.02 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD A6 5200

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 5200

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Newer manufacturing process 28 nms vs 40 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.48 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better PassMark score 2,436 vs 705 Around 3.5x better PassMark score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 3,294 vs 982 More than 3.2x better geekbench (32-bit) score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 707 vs 393 Around 80% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per watt 14.31 pt/W vs 6.34 pt/W More than 2.2x better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz vs 1.48 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of E1 E1-1500 vs A6 5200

GeekBench (32-bit)

A6 5200
3,294

GeekBench

A6 5200
3,294

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E1 E1-1500  vs
A6 5200 
Clock speed 1.48 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES

power consumption

TDP 18W 25W
Annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year 6.02 $/year
Performance per watt 6.34 pt/W 14.31 pt/W
Typical power consumption 14.63W 20.31W

details

E1 E1-1500  vs
A6 5200 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nms 28 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.5 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.48 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.5 GHz 2 GHz
AMD E1 E1-1500
Report a correction
AMD A6 5200
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus