Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD E1 6010

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD E1 6010

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E1 6010

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 6010

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 664,400 MB/s vs 52.6 MB/s Around 12631.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 25.98 pt/W vs 0.34 pt/W Around 75.5x better performance per watt
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 72.31W 8.9x lower typical power consumption
Newer Apr, 2014 vs May, 2006 Release date over 8 years later
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 70 °C Around 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 21.44 $/year 8.9x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 77.96 $/year 8.9x lower annual commercial energy cost
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,248 vs 696 Around 80% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.35 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.69 GHz vs 1.35 GHz Around 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.87 GHz vs 1.35 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of E1 6010 vs Athlon 64 3200+

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E1 6010
664,400 MB/s
Athlon 64 3200+
52.6 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E1 6010  vs
Athlon 64 3200+ 
Clock speed 1.35 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
BGA 769
754
AM2

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

E1 6010  vs
Athlon 64 3200+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.35 GHz 2.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.35 GHz 2.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.35 GHz 2.69 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 89W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 21.44 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 77.96 $/year
Performance per watt 25.98 pt/W 0.34 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 72.31W
AMD E1 6010
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus