AMD E1 6010 vs Athlon 64 3200+ |
Released April, 2014
AMD E1 6010
- 1.35 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E1 6010
 | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 664,400 MB/s | | Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm |
| | Much better performance per watt 25.98 pt/W | | Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W |
VS
Released May, 2006
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
- 2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Athlon 64 3200+
| | Higher clock speed 2 GHz | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
| | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.69 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.87 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
AMD E1 6010CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 664,400 MB/s | vs | 52.6 MB/s | Around 12631.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much newer manufacturing process | 28 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 25.98 pt/W | vs | 0.34 pt/W | Around 75.5x better performance per watt | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 72.31W | 8.9x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer | Apr, 2014 | vs | May, 2006 | Release date over 8 years later | |||
| Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 90 °C | vs | 70 °C | Around 30% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | 8.9x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | 8.9x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 1,248 | vs | 696 | Around 80% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.35 GHz | Around 50% higher clock speed | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.69 GHz | vs | 1.35 GHz | Around 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.87 GHz | vs | 1.35 GHz | Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of E1 6010 vs Athlon 64 3200+
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E1 6010 | vs | Athlon 64 3200+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.35 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 769 | |||
| 754 | |||
| AM2 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | E1 6010 | vs | Athlon 64 3200+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 28 nm | 130 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 90°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.35 GHz | 2.69 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.35 GHz | 2.87 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.35 GHz | 2.69 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 10W | 89W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 21.44 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 77.96 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 25.98 pt/W | 0.34 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 72.31W | |
 AMD E1 6010  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
