CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2500 vs 1500 among laptop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

E1 2500
n.d.
E1 1500
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD E1 2500 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD E1 2500  based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E1 2500

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 2500

Report a correction
Newer Apr, 2013 vs Jan, 2013 Release date 3 months later
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 14.63W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Better geekbench 3 single core score 730 vs 574 More than 25% better geekbench 3 single core score
Better performance per watt 13.74 pt/W vs 2.84 pt/W More than 4.8x better performance per watt
Lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 4.34 $/year More than 15% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD E1 1500

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 1500

Report a correction
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 529 MHz vs 400 MHz More than 30% higher GPU clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of E1 2500 vs 1500

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E1 2500
1,221
E1 1500
1,022

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E1 2500
730
E1 1500
574

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E1 2500
677,550 MB/s
E1 1500
47,850 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E1 2500
1,162
E1 1500
964

GeekBench

E1 2500
1,162
E1 1500
964

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E1 2500
890
E1 1500
693

PassMark (Single Core)

E1 2500
523
E1 1500
392

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E1 2500  vs
1500 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.48 GHz
Turbo clock speed None None
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 15W 18W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 4.34 $/year
Performance per watt 13.74 pt/W 2.84 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 14.63W

details

E1 2500  vs
1500 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.4 GHz 1.48 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.4 GHz 1.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Radeon™ HD 8240 AMD Radeon HD 7310
GPU clock speed 400 MHz 529 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3L-1333
AMD E1 2500
Report a correction
AMD E1 1500
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus