CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2500 vs 5050

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

E1 2500
5.5
A4 5050
6.1
3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

E1 2500
6.2
A4 5050
6.3
Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

E1 2500
5.6
A4 5050
5.6
TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

E1 2500
1.6
A4 5050
2.5
Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

E1 2500
5.6
A4 5050
5.9

Winner
AMD A4 5050 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A4 5050  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A4 5050

AMD A4 5050

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E1 2500

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 2500

Report a correction
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Front view of AMD A4 5050

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 5050

Report a correction
More l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Slightly higher clock speed 1.55 GHz vs 1.4 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 2,038.5 vs 1,021 Around 2x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Better PassMark score 1,903 vs 899 More than 2x better PassMark score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 2,500 vs 1,154 Around 2.2x better geekbench (32-bit) score
Better performance per watt 20.97 pt/W vs 9.37 pt/W Around 2.2x better performance per watt
Newer Feb, 2014 vs Apr, 2013 Release date 9 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of E1 2500 vs A4 5050

GeekBench (32-bit)

E1 2500
1,154
A4 5050
2,500

GeekBench

E1 2500
1,154
A4 5050
2,720

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

E1 2500
1,021
A4 5050
2,038.5

Passmark

E1 2500
899
A4 5050
1,903

Passmark (Single Core)

E1 2500
523
A4 5050
583

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E1 2500  vs
A4 5050 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.55 GHz
Turbo clock speed None None
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
F16C
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
SSE Family

power consumption

TDP 15W 13.5W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 3.25 $/year
Performance per watt 9.37 pt/W 20.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 10.97W

details

E1 2500  vs
A4 5050 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nms 28 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C Unknown - 90°C

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Radeon™ HD 8240 Radeon HD 8330

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3L-1333
AMD E1 2500
Report a correction
AMD A4 5050
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus