CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2500 vs 5000

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

E1 2500
5.5
A4 5000
6.1
3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

E1 2500
6.1
A4 5000
6.6
Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

E1 2500
5.6
A4 5000
5.6
TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

E1 2500
1.6
A4 5000
2.5
Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

E1 2500
5.6
A4 5000
6.0

Winner
AMD A4 5000 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A4 5000  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A4 5000

AMD A4 5000

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E1 2500

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 2500

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E1 2500 vs the A4 5000.

Front view of AMD A4 5000

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 5000

Report a correction
More l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Slightly higher clock speed 1.55 GHz vs 1.4 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 2,038.5 vs 1,021 Around 2x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 2,499 vs 1,162 Around 2.2x better geekbench (32-bit) score
Better PassMark score 1,904 vs 890 Around 2.2x better PassMark score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 719 vs 523 More than 35% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better performance per watt 20.72 pt/W vs 9.25 pt/W Around 2.2x better performance per watt
Newer Feb, 2014 vs Apr, 2013 Release date 9 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of E1 2500 vs A4 5000

GeekBench (32-bit)

E1 2500
1,162
A4 5000
2,499

GeekBench

E1 2500
1,162
A4 5000
2,720

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

E1 2500
1,021
A4 5000
2,038.5

Passmark

E1 2500
890
A4 5000
1,904

Passmark (Single Core)

E1 2500
523
A4 5000
719

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E1 2500  vs
A4 5000 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.55 GHz
Turbo clock speed None None
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600

details

E1 2500  vs
A4 5000 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Radeon™ HD 8240 Radeon HD 8330

power consumption

TDP 15W 13.5W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 3.25 $/year
Performance per watt 9.25 pt/W 20.72 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 10.97W
AMD E1 2500
Report a correction
AMD A4 5000
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus