CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2100 vs 350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

E1 2100
4.9
E 350
4.9
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

E1 2100
6.2
E 350
6.3
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

E1 2100
n.d.
E 350
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

E1 2100
4.9
E 350
4.3
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

E1 2100
8.3
E 350
6.5
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

E1 2100
n.d.
E 350
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

E1 2100
7.1
E 350
6.4

Winner
AMD E 350 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD E 350  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD E 350

AMD E 350

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E1 2100

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 2100

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 494,700 MB/s vs 51,600 MB/s More than 9.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 16.08 pt/W vs 1.5 pt/W Around 10.8x better performance per watt
Significantly lower typical power consumption 7.31W vs 30.2W 4.1x lower typical power consumption
Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score 9.64 mHash/s vs 7.51 mHash/s Around 30% better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score
Newer Apr, 2013 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.17 $/year vs 12 $/year 5.5x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 7.88 $/year vs 28.21 $/year 3.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 24 vs 13.7 More than 75% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 60% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 1 GHz 3.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 492 MHz vs 300 MHz Around 65% higher GPU clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 1 GHz 3.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of E1 2100 vs E 350

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

E1 2100
9.64 mHash/s
E 350
7.51 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

E1 2100
60.55 fps
E 350
50.77 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

E1 2100
0.24 fps
E 350
0.1 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E1 2100
912
E 350
1,096

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E1 2100
529
E 350
620

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E1 2100
494,700 MB/s
E 350
51,600 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E1 2100
627
E 350
782

PassMark (Single Core)

E1 2100
363
E 350
420

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E1 2100  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 1 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed None None
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 9W 18W
Annual home energy cost 2.17 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 7.88 $/year 28.21 $/year
Performance per watt 16.08 pt/W 1.5 pt/W
Typical power consumption 7.31W 30.2W

details

E1 2100  vs
E 350 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Radeon™ HD 8210 Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX 11.0 11.0
GPU clock speed 300 MHz 492 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3L-1333
AMD E1 2100
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus