AMD E1 1500 vs Athlon 64 3100+ |
Released January, 2013
AMD E1 1500
- 1.48 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E1 1500
 | Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm | | Lower typical power consumption 14.63W |
| | More cores 2 | | Slightly better performance per watt 2.5 pt/W |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Athlon 64 3100+
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Athlon 64 3100+
| | Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
| | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.47 GHz | | Better PassMark (Single core) score 663 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | AMD Athlon 64 3100+CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 40 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower typical power consumption | 14.63W | vs | 20.31W | Around 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Slightly better performance per watt | 2.5 pt/W | vs | 1.84 pt/W | More than 35% better performance per watt | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year | vs | 6.02 $/year | Around 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 15.77 $/year | vs | 21.9 $/year | Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.48 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.47 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 663 | vs | 391 | Around 70% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.48 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of E1 1500 vs Athlon 64 3100+
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E1 1500 | vs | Athlon 64 3100+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.48 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | E1 1500 | vs | Athlon 64 3100+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 40 nm | 130 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.47 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.48 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.5 GHz | 2.47 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 18W | 25W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 15.77 $/year | 21.9 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.5 pt/W | 1.84 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 14.63W | 20.31W | |
 AMD E1 1500  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon 64 3100+ Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $10 | ||
| 330M vs 1500 | ||
 | VS | |
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 1500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | ||
| 3220 vs 1500 | ||
 | VS | |
| E8235 vs 1500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | ||
| E8400 vs 1500 | ||
 | VS | |
| 450 vs 1500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | ||
| 1007U vs 1500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $50 | $125 | |
| 5300 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
