Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD C 50

AMD C 50

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E1 1200

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 1200

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 21.1 vs 19.8 More than 5% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Higher clock speed 1.4 GHz vs 1 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score 7.01 mHash/s vs 4.04 mHash/s Around 75% better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of AMD C 50

Reasons to consider the
AMD C 50

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 7.31W vs 14.63W 2x lower typical power consumption
More l3 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
Better performance per watt 3.24 pt/W vs 2.33 pt/W Around 40% better performance per watt
Lower annual home energy cost 2.17 $/year vs 4.34 $/year 2x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 7.88 $/year vs 15.77 $/year 2x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of E1 1200 vs C 50

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

E1 1200
7.01 mHash/s
AMD C 50
4.04 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

E1 1200
31.57 fps
AMD C 50
29.59 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

E1 1200
2.29 fps
AMD C 50
1.29 fps

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E1 1200
906
AMD C 50
678

GeekBench

E1 1200
1,310
AMD C 50
982

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

E1 1200
21.1
AMD C 50
19.8

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E1 1200
666
AMD C 50
462

PassMark (Single Core)

E1 1200
368
AMD C 50
265

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E1 1200  vs
C 50 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

E1 1200  vs
C 50 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.88 - 1.35V 1.05 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Radeon™ HD 7310 Radeon™ HD 6250
Latest DirectX 11.0 11.0

power consumption

TDP 18W 9W
Annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year 2.17 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year 7.88 $/year
Performance per watt 2.33 pt/W 3.24 pt/W
Typical power consumption 14.63W 7.31W
AMD E1 1200
Report a correction
AMD C 50
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus