Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E 450

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 450

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Slightly higher clock speed 1.65 GHz vs 1.47 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Athlon XP 1700+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 1700+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon XP 1700+ vs the E 450.

Benchmarks Real world tests of E 450 vs Athlon XP 1700+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E 450  vs
Athlon XP 1700+ 
Clock speed 1.65 GHz 1.47 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
Super 7
462

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

E 450  vs
Athlon XP 1700+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 14.63W N/A

bus

Clock speed 100 MHz 266 MHz
AMD E 450
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP 1700+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus