Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD E 450

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD E 450

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E 450

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 450

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Significantly lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 45.83W 3.1x lower typical power consumption
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better performance per watt 2.98 pt/W vs 0.62 pt/W More than 4.8x better performance per watt
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 13.59 $/year 3.1x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 49.41 $/year 3.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon MP 2100+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon MP 2100+

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 1.73 GHz vs 1.65 GHz Around 5% higher clock speed
Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score 503 vs 431 More than 15% better PassMark (Single core) score

Benchmarks Real world tests of E 450 vs Athlon MP 2100+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E 450  vs
Athlon MP 2100+ 
Clock speed 1.65 GHz 1.73 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
Super 7
462
563

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

E 450  vs
Athlon MP 2100+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 18W 56.4W
Annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year 13.59 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year 49.41 $/year
Performance per watt 2.98 pt/W 0.62 pt/W
Typical power consumption 14.63W 45.83W

bus

Clock speed 100 MHz 266 MHz
AMD E 450
Report a correction
AMD Athlon MP 2100+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus