Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E 450

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 450

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 52.81W 3.6x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 3.6x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 3.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD A4 3360

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 3360

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the E 450  vs A4 3360 

L2 cache

E 450
1 MB
A4 3360
2 MB

TDP

E 450
18W
A4 3360
65W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E 450  vs
A4 3360 
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
Super 7
FM1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

E 450  vs
A4 3360 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 18W 65W
Annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 14.63W 52.81W
AMD E 450
Report a correction
AMD A4 3360
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus