CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 350 vs 240 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

E 350
3.3
E 240
4.9
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

E 350
5.1
E 240
5.0
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

E 350
0.0
E 240
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

E 350
5.7
E 240
5.1
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

E 350
5.6
E 240
5.9
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

E 350
n.d.
E 240
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

E 350
6.2
E 240
7.4

Winner
AMD E 350 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD E 350  based on its features.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 350 vs the 240.

Front view of AMD E 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 240

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 240 vs the 350.

Benchmarks Real world tests of E 350 vs 240

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

E 350
50.77 fps
E 240
11.46 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
1,096
E 240
513

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
620
E 240
522

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
51,600 MB/s
E 240
45,800 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
1,032
E 240
508

GeekBench

E 350
1,861
E 240
929

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E 350
782
E 240
321

PassMark (Single Core)

E 350
420
E 240
350

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E 350  vs
240 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed None None
Cores Dual core Single core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066

details

E 350  vs
240 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 8 5
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.35V 1.18 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Radeon™ HD 6310 Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX 11.0 11.0
GPU clock speed 492 MHz 500 MHz

power consumption

TDP 18W 18W
Performance per watt 1.5 pt/W 1.81 pt/W
Typical power consumption 30.2W 14.63W
AMD E 350
Report a correction
AMD E 240
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus