Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 0.8 GHz 2x higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.06 MB Around 16.8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.06 MB/core More than 8.2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Duron 800 MHz

Reasons to consider the
AMD Duron 800 MHz

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Duron 800 MHz vs the E 350.

Features Key features of the E 350  vs Duron 800 MHz 

clock speed

E 350
1.6 GHz
Duron 800 MHz
0.8 GHz

L2 cache

E 350
1 MB
Duron 800 MHz
0.06 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E 350  vs
Duron 800 MHz 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 0.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

E 350  vs
Duron 800 MHz 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.06 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.06 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 30.2W N/A
AMD E 350
Report a correction
AMD Duron 800 MHz
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus