Winner
AMD Athlon II X2 270u
CPUBoss recommends the AMD Athlon II X2 270u based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details | AMD E 350 vs Athlon II X2 270u |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Newer manufacturing process 40 nm |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz | ![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C |
![]() | Higher clock speed 2 GHz | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 20.31W |
![]() | Better PassMark (Single core) score 701 | ![]() | Better performance per watt 2.68 pt/W |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
7.4 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| ![]() | AMD Athlon II X2 270uCPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Newer manufacturing process | 40 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 90 °C | vs | 81 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Jan, 2011 | vs | Sep, 2010 | Release date 3 months later | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 20.31W | vs | 30.2W | Around 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 701 | vs | 420 | More than 65% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better performance per watt | 2.68 pt/W | vs | 1.5 pt/W | Around 80% better performance per watt | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | vs | 12 $/year | Around 50% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | vs | 28.21 $/year | More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost |
summary | E 350 | vs | Athlon II X2 270u |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
AMD64 | |||
AMD-V | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 18W | 25W | |
Annual home energy cost | 12 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 28.21 $/year | 21.9 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.5 pt/W | 2.68 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 30.2W | 20.31W |
details | E 350 | vs | Athlon II X2 270u |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 40 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 1.25 - 1.35V | 0.82 - 1.15V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 90°C | Unknown - 81°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.5 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.5 GHz | 2 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Radeon™ HD 6310 | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | 11.0 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 492 MHz | N/A |
AMD E 350 ![]() | AMD Athlon II X2 270u ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
3220 vs 350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
E8400 vs 350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | ||
847 vs 350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
J1900 vs 350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | ||
D525 vs 350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
450 vs 350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||