Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 1.77 GHz More than 95% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jan, 2011 vs May, 2010 Release date 7 months later
Front view of AMD Athlon II Neo K125

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II Neo K125

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 735 vs 24 Around 30.8x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 67,000 MB/s vs 51,600 MB/s Around 30% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly lower typical power consumption 9.75W vs 30.2W 3.1x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better performance per watt 4.54 pt/W vs 1.5 pt/W More than 3x better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 2.89 $/year vs 12 $/year 4.2x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 10.51 $/year vs 28.21 $/year 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of E 350 vs Athlon II Neo K125

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
51,600 MB/s
Athlon II Neo K125
67,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E 350  vs
Athlon II Neo K125 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 18W 12W
Annual home energy cost 12 $/year 2.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 28.21 $/year 10.51 $/year
Performance per watt 1.5 pt/W 4.54 pt/W
Typical power consumption 30.2W 9.75W

details

E 350  vs
Athlon II Neo K125 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.5 GHz 1.77 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz 1.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz 1.77 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Radeon™ HD 6310 N/A
Latest DirectX 11.0 N/A
GPU clock speed 492 MHz N/A
AMD E 350
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II Neo K125
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus