Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD E 350

Front view of AMD E 350
Front view of AMD A4 6210

AMD A4 6210

CPUBoss Winner
Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD A4 6210

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 6210

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 896,200 MB/s vs 51,600 MB/s More than 17.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 18.19 pt/W vs 1.5 pt/W Around 12.2x better performance per watt
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score 0.45 fps vs 0.1 fps More than 4.2x better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score
Lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 30.2W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Higher GPU clock speed 600 MHz vs 492 MHz More than 20% higher GPU clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Apr, 2014 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 3 years later
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 24.1 vs 24 Almost the same
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better PassMark score 2,143 vs 782 Around 2.8x better PassMark score
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 12 $/year 3.3x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 28.21 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of E 350 vs A4 6210

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

E 350
7.51 mHash/s
A4 6210
18.78 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

E 350
50.77 fps
A4 6210
95.53 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

E 350
0.1 fps
A4 6210
0.45 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
1,096
A4 6210
3,054

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
620
A4 6210
980

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
51,600 MB/s
A4 6210
896,200 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E 350
782
A4 6210
2,143

PassMark (Single Core)

E 350
420
A4 6210
694

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 E 350  vs
A4 6210 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 18W 15W
Annual home energy cost 12 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 28.21 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 1.5 pt/W 18.19 pt/W
Typical power consumption 30.2W 12.19W

details

 E 350  vs
A4 6210 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.35V 0.5 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 3.5 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz 1.8 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Radeon™ HD 6310 Radeon™ R3
GPU clock speed 492 MHz 600 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1066
AMD E 350
Report a correction
AMD A4 6210
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss