Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E 300

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 300

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 28.44W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Newer Aug, 2011 vs Sep, 2009 Release date over 1 years later
Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 30.66 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon II PCs M320

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II PCs M320

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,667.5 vs 20.3 Around 82.2x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 83,750 MB/s vs 41,900 MB/s Around 2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly higher clock speed 2.1 GHz vs 1.3 GHz More than 60% higher clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of E 300 vs Athlon II PCs M320

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 300
41,900 MB/s
Athlon II PCs M320
83,750 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

E 300
20.3

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E 300  vs
Athlon II PCs M320 
Clock speed 1.3 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

E 300  vs
Athlon II PCs M320 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Radeon™ HD 6310 N/A
Latest DirectX 11.0 N/A
GPU clock speed 488 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 18W 35W
Annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 2.34 pt/W 2.23 pt/W
Typical power consumption 14.63W 28.44W
AMD E 300
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II PCs M320
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus