Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD C 70

AMD C 70

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 240

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 22.9 vs 19.3 Around 20% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 45,800 MB/s vs 36,800 MB/s Around 25% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Higher clock speed 1.5 GHz vs 1 GHz 50% higher clock speed
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 500 MHz vs 276 MHz More than 80% higher GPU clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better turbo clock speed 500 MHz vs 400 MHz 25% better turbo clock speed
More l3 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
Front view of AMD C 70

Reasons to consider the
AMD C 70

Report a correction
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1.33 GHz vs None Compared to all cpus, 1.33 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK
Lower typical power consumption 7.31W vs 14.63W 2x lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 3.88 pt/W vs 1.81 pt/W Around 2.2x better performance per watt
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Lower annual home energy cost 2.17 $/year vs 4.34 $/year 2x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 7.88 $/year vs 15.77 $/year 2x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of E 240 vs C 70

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 240
513
AMD C 70
755

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 240
522
AMD C 70
437

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 240
45,800 MB/s
AMD C 70
36,800 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 240
508
AMD C 70
694

GeekBench

E 240
929
AMD C 70
694

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

E 240
22.9
AMD C 70
19.3

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E 240
321
AMD C 70
572

PassMark (Single Core)

E 240
350
AMD C 70
315

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E 240  vs
C 70 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1 GHz
Turbo clock speed None 1.33 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066

details

E 240  vs
C 70 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 5 5
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Radeon™ HD 6310 Radeon™ HD 7290
Latest DirectX 11.0 11.0
GPU clock speed 500 MHz 276 MHz
Turbo clock speed 500 MHz 400 MHz

power consumption

TDP 18W 9W
Annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year 2.17 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year 7.88 $/year
Performance per watt 1.81 pt/W 3.88 pt/W
Typical power consumption 14.63W 7.31W
AMD E 240
Report a correction
AMD C 70
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus