Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 240

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 28.44W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 30.66 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon Neo X2 6650e

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon Neo X2 6650e

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Features Key features of the E 240  vs Athlon Neo X2 6650e 

clock speed

E 240
1.5 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E 240  vs
Athlon Neo X2 6650e 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
940
AM2

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

E 240  vs
Athlon Neo X2 6650e 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 18W 35W
Annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year 30.66 $/year
Typical power consumption 14.63W 28.44W
AMD E 240
Report a correction
AMD Athlon Neo X2 6650e
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus