Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 240

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Jan, 2009 Release date over 2 years later
Front view of AMD Athlon Neo 40

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon Neo 40

Report a correction
Higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C vs 90 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature

Features Key features of the E 240  vs Athlon Neo 40 

clock speed

E 240
1.5 GHz
Athlon Neo 40
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

E 240
1 MB
Athlon Neo 40
0.5 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E 240  vs
Athlon Neo 40 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

E 240  vs
Athlon Neo 40 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C Unknown - 95°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Radeon™ HD 6310 N/A
Latest DirectX 11.0 N/A
GPU clock speed 500 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 500 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 18W 15W
Annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year 13.14 $/year
Typical power consumption 14.63W 12.19W
AMD E 240
Report a correction
AMD Athlon Neo 40
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus