Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD E 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 240

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Higher clock speed 1.5 GHz vs 1.2 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Front view of AMD Athlon MP 1200

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon MP 1200

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon MP 1200 vs the E 240.

Features Key features of the E 240  vs Athlon MP 1200 

clock speed

E 240
1.5 GHz
Athlon MP 1200
1.2 GHz

L2 cache

E 240
1 MB
Athlon MP 1200
0.25 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E 240  vs
Athlon MP 1200 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
940
462

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

E 240  vs
Athlon MP 1200 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 14.63W N/A
AMD E 240
Report a correction
AMD Athlon MP 1200
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus