Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD C-60

Reasons to consider the
AMD C-60

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Athlon 4 1500+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 4 1500+

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.3 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz vs 1.34 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.3 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of AMD C-60 vs Athlon 4 1500+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

AMD C-60  vs
Athlon 4 1500+ 
Clock speed 1 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

Typical power consumption 7.31W N/A

details

AMD C-60  vs
Athlon 4 1500+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.34 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1 GHz 1.3 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 406.8 397.8
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.34 GHz 1.6 GHz
AMD C-60
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 4 1500+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus