Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD Athlon Neo MV-40

AMD Athlon Neo MV-40

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD C 50

Reasons to consider the
AMD C 50

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Lower typical power consumption 7.31W vs 12.19W 40% lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Jan, 2009 Release date over 2 years later
Better performance per watt 3.24 pt/W vs 2.17 pt/W Around 50% better performance per watt
Lower annual home energy cost 2.17 $/year vs 3.61 $/year 40% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 7.88 $/year vs 13.14 $/year 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon Neo MV-40

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon Neo MV-40

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 614 vs 19.8 More than 31x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 60% higher clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 433 vs 265 Around 65% better PassMark (Single core) score
Higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C vs 90 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature

Benchmarks Real world tests of AMD C 50 vs Athlon Neo MV-40

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

AMD C 50  vs
Athlon Neo MV-40 
Clock speed 1 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

AMD C 50  vs
Athlon Neo MV-40 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C Unknown - 95°C

power consumption

TDP 9W 15W
Annual home energy cost 2.17 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 7.88 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 3.24 pt/W 2.17 pt/W
Typical power consumption 7.31W 12.19W
AMD C 50
Report a correction
AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus