Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD C 50

Reasons to consider the
AMD C 50

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.25 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Athlon MP 1800+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon MP 1800+

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.53 GHz vs 1 GHz Around 55% higher clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 462 vs 265 Around 75% better PassMark (Single core) score

Benchmarks Real world tests of AMD C 50 vs Athlon MP 1800+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

AMD C 50  vs
Athlon MP 1800+ 
Clock speed 1 GHz 1.53 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

AMD C 50  vs
Athlon MP 1800+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 7.31W N/A
AMD C 50
Report a correction
AMD Athlon MP 1800+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus