Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon XP-M 2400+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP-M 2400+

Report a correction
More l2 cache 0.5 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 0.5 MB l2 cache is just OK
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 0.5 MB/core l2 cache per core is just OK
Front view of AMD Athlon II X4 620e

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X4 620e

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 50% higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Athlon XP-M 2400+  vs II X4 620e 

clock speed

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

overclocked clock speed (water)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon XP-M 2400+  vs
II X4 620e 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core
Socket type
462
AM3

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Clock speed 266 MHz 2,000 MHz

details

Athlon XP-M 2400+  vs
II X4 620e 
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.59 GHz 2.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 2.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.59 GHz 2.6 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 36.56W
AMD Athlon XP-M 2400+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II X4 620e
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus