Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon XP 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 3000+

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Front view of AMD A8 6410

Reasons to consider the
AMD A8 6410

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Better PassMark (Single core) score 884 vs 561 Around 60% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 2,536 vs 365 Around 7x better PassMark score
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon XP 3000+ vs A8 6410

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon XP 3000+  vs
A8 6410 
Clock speed 2.1 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core
Socket type
462
BGA 769

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES

details

Athlon XP 3000+  vs
A8 6410 
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 12.19W
AMD Athlon XP 3000+
Report a correction
AMD A8 6410
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus