Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon XP 2000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 2000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon XP 2000+ vs the A4 5300.

Front view of AMD A4 5300

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 5300

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 1.67 GHz More than 2x higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Athlon XP 2000+  vs A4 5300 

clock speed

Athlon XP 2000+
1.67 GHz
A4 5300
3.4 GHz

L2 cache

Athlon XP 2000+
0.25 MB
A4 5300
1 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon XP 2000+  vs
A4 5300 
Clock speed 1.67 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
SSE3
SSE
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
AES

details

Athlon XP 2000+  vs
A4 5300 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 52.81W
AMD Athlon XP 2000+
Report a correction
AMD A4 5300
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus