Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon XP 1100

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 1100

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon XP 1100 vs the Athlon II X2 250.

Front view of AMD Athlon II X2 250

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X2 250

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.25 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 2.8x higher clock speed
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits

Features Key features of the Athlon XP 1100  vs II X2 250 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon XP 1100  vs
II X2 250 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
462
AM3

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
ABM
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM

details

Athlon XP 1100  vs
II X2 250 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 180 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 52.81W

bus

Clock speed 200 MHz 2,000 MHz
AMD Athlon XP 1100
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II X2 250
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus