Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon XP 1100

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 1100

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon XP 1100 vs the Athlon 3200+.

Front view of AMD Athlon 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 3200+

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 80% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits

Features Key features of the Athlon XP 1100  vs 3200+ 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon XP 1100  vs
3200+ 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
462
939

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Athlon XP 1100  vs
3200+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 180 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 54.44W
AMD Athlon XP 1100
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 3200+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus