0 Comments
| AMD Athlon X4 860K vs A8 7600 |
Released August, 2014
AMD Athlon X4 860K
- 3.7 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon X4 860K
![]() | Is unlocked Yes | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.7 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.37 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.45 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2014
AMD A8 7600
- 3.1 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the A8 7600
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W |
![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year | ![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher clock speed | 3.7 GHz | vs | 3.1 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.37 GHz | vs | 3.99 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.45 GHz | vs | 3.81 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 77.19W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon X4 860K vs A8 7600
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon X4 860K
7,520
A8 7600
6,014
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon X4 860K
2,478
A8 7600
2,062
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon X4 860K
2,290,000 MB/s
A8 7600
1,970,000 MB/s
Cinebench R10 32-Bit
Athlon X4 860K
14,083
A8 7600
13,324
Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)
Athlon X4 860K
4,146
A8 7600
3,928
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Athlon X4 860K
5,468
A8 7600
5,126
PassMark (Single Core)
Athlon X4 860K
1,596
A8 7600
1,541
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Athlon X4 860K | vs | A8 7600 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Is unlocked | Yes | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
BMI1 | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
TBM | |||
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 9.83 pt/W | 8.09 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 52.81W |
details | Athlon X4 860K | vs | A8 7600 |
---|---|---|---|
L2 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 28 nm | 28 nm | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.37 GHz | 3.99 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.45 GHz | 3.81 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.37 GHz | 3.99 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Radeon™ R7 | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 720 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-2133 | |||
DDR3-1866 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 29,866.66 MB/s | 34,133.32 MB/s |
AMD Athlon X4 860K ![]() | AMD A8 7600 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$190 | ||
7600 vs 4460 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$90 | ||
7600 vs 7650K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $70 | |
860K vs G3258 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $100 | |
860K vs 6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $190 | |
860K vs 4460 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $115 | |
860K vs 7850K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $125 | |
860K vs 6100 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
Risky Muhammad Faisal (02:38 PM, July 27, 2017)