Winner
AMD Athlon X4 860K
CPUBoss recommends the AMD Athlon X4 860K based on its .
See full details | AMD Athlon X4 860K vs A10 5800K |
by Nick-Farrell (Aug, 2014)AMD has fitted the CPU with 2 MB of L2 cache and it should be priced for the budget market.
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
by Legit Reviews (Sep, 2012)Legit Bottom Line: The AMD A10-5800K APU looks impressive in the game benchmarks and easily beat the Intel Core i7-3770K, which is a much more expensive processor!
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Fire Strike |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
9.5 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon X4 860K vs the A10 5800K. | |||||||
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required |
---|
summary | Athlon X4 860K | vs | A10 5800K |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 4 GHz | 4.2 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Is unlocked | Yes | Yes | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
XOP | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
BMI1 | |||
CLMUL | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
TBM | |||
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 100W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 24.09 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 87.6 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 9.85 pt/W | 5.49 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 81.25W |
details | Athlon X4 860K | vs | A10 5800K |
---|---|---|---|
L2 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 28 nm | 32 nm | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.38 GHz | 4.48 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.4 GHz | 4.59 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.38 GHz | 4.48 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Radeon™ HD 7660D | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 800 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1866 |
AMD Athlon X4 860K ![]() | AMD A10 5800K ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$85 | $296 | |
5800K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$85 | $117 | |
5800K vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$65 | $81 | |
860K vs 6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$65 | $70 | |
860K vs G3258 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$65 | $115 | |
860K vs 7850K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$65 | $192 | |
860K vs 4460 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$65 | ||
860K vs 7600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $168 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$296 | ||
6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $296 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6100U vs N4200 | ||