0 Comments
| AMD Athlon X2 6000+ vs II X2 275 |
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Athlon II X2 275
- 3.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the II X2 275
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.5 GHz |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon X2 6000+ vs the Athlon II X2 275. | |||||||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 101.56W | Around 50% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 30.11 $/year | Around 50% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 109.5 $/year | Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Athlon X2 6000+ vs II X2 275
clock speed
Athlon X2 6000+
3 GHz
Athlon II X2 275
3.5 GHz
L2 cache
Athlon X2 6000+
2 MB
Athlon II X2 275
2 MB
TDP
Athlon X2 6000+
125W
Athlon II X2 275
65W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Athlon X2 6000+ | vs | II X2 275 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Athlon X2 6000+ | vs | II X2 275 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 125W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 30.11 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 109.5 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 101.56W | 52.81W |
AMD Athlon X2 6000+ ![]() | AMD Athlon II X2 275 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
E8400 vs 6000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
250 vs 6000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
5000+ vs 6000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
7750 vs 6000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
3800+ vs 6000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Q6600 vs 6000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
5200+ vs 6000+ | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||