Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon X2 6000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 6000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon X2 6000+ vs the Athlon II X2 275.

Front view of AMD Athlon II X2 275

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X2 275

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 101.56W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 30.11 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 109.5 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Athlon X2 6000+  vs II X2 275 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon X2 6000+  vs
II X2 275 
Clock speed 3 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Athlon X2 6000+  vs
II X2 275 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 125W 65W
Annual home energy cost 30.11 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 109.5 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 101.56W 52.81W
AMD Athlon X2 6000+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II X2 275
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus