Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon X2 6000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 6000+

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark score 1,604 vs 544 Around 3x better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 898 vs 653 Around 40% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,188 vs 824 Around 2.8x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3400+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3400+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon 64 3400+ vs the Athlon X2 6000+.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon X2 6000+ vs 64 3400+

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon X2 6000+  vs
64 3400+ 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
AM2
939

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Athlon X2 6000+  vs
64 3400+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 101.56W N/A
AMD Athlon X2 6000+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3400+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus