CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6000+ vs 3800+ among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

3.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Athlon X2 6000+ 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Athlon X2 6000+  based on its overclocking.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon X2 6000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 6000+

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.33 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.53 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Feb, 2007 vs Jun, 2004 Release date over 2 years later
Front view of AMD Athlon 3800+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 3800+

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 101.56W 2.8x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 109.5 $/year 2.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 30.11 $/year 2.8x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon X2 6000+ vs 3800+

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Athlon X2 6000+
86.1 MB/s
Athlon 3800+
64.55 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon X2 6000+  vs
3800+ 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
AM2
939
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 125W 45W
Annual home energy cost 30.11 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 109.5 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 0.53 pt/W 0.73 pt/W
Typical power consumption 101.56W 36.56W

details

Athlon X2 6000+  vs
3800+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 0 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 0 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 55°C Unknown - 55°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 26 7
Overclocked clock speed 3.33 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.53 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.33 GHz 2.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Athlon X2 6000+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 3800+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus